- Thu May 18, 2017 10:43:07 pm
#6054
Solid opening line, I like it
- Thu May 18, 2017 11:01:22 pm
#6067
Thanks! I think it says just what I'm trying to say, I may just not need to type anything else. I don't want to ruin it's profound impact.
- Sat May 20, 2017 10:24:47 pm
#6314
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like most of you. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have found it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get mean, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have found it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get mean, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 6:38:08 pm
#6367
Spencer
FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
Reply
FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Thu May 18, 2017 10:15:43 pm#6013 I'll type this up later!
User avatar
SPENCER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Kimmi Kappenberg
- Thu May 18, 2017 10:43:07 pm#6054 Solid opening line, I like it
User avatar
KIMMI KAPPENBERG
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Thu May 18, 2017 11:01:22 pm#6067 Thanks! I think it says just what I'm trying to say, I may just not need to type anything else. I don't want to ruin it's profound impact.
User avatar
SPENCER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Jeff Varner
- Fri May 19, 2017 5:52:00 pm#6239
Kimmi Kappenberg wrote: ↑
Thu May 18, 2017 10:43:07 pm
Solid opening line, I like it
User avatar
JEFF VARNER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Sat May 20, 2017 10:24:47 pm#6314 Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like most of you. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have found it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
Reply
FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Thu May 18, 2017 10:15:43 pm#6013 I'll type this up later!
User avatar
SPENCER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Kimmi Kappenberg
- Thu May 18, 2017 10:43:07 pm#6054 Solid opening line, I like it
User avatar
KIMMI KAPPENBERG
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Thu May 18, 2017 11:01:22 pm#6067 Thanks! I think it says just what I'm trying to say, I may just not need to type anything else. I don't want to ruin it's profound impact.
User avatar
SPENCER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Jeff Varner
- Fri May 19, 2017 5:52:00 pm#6239
Kimmi Kappenberg wrote: ↑
Thu May 18, 2017 10:43:07 pm
Solid opening line, I like it
User avatar
JEFF VARNER
RE: FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEECH
By Spencer
- Sat May 20, 2017 10:24:47 pm#6314 Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like most of you. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have found it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 6:39:19 pm
#6368
Ignore that latest mess of a message, this is what I get for trying to use mobile at work :P
- Sun May 21, 2017 7:26:33 pm
#6381
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like most of you. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 7:34:11 pm
#6384
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like most of you. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. Tai, if you've ever seen Survivor you know people never vote for the unnecessarily antagonistic dude to win, so why you incorporated that so much into your strategy I'll never know.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. Tai, if you've ever seen Survivor you know people never vote for the unnecessarily antagonistic dude to win, so why you incorporated that so much into your strategy I'll never know.
Now, I could ask you two to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question for both of you is why does the person next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 8:30:00 pm
#6475
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 8:36:28 pm
#6485
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 8:38:06 pm
#6492
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 8:44:04 pm
#6508
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
So, my question all of you is why do the people next to you deserve to lose? Why are they unfitting of the title Sole Survivor?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 9:02:13 pm
#6556
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that completely.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
Given how completely terrible you guys have been at answering questions tonight, I've done some revising:
Aubry - You definitely weren't the most aware of what was going on. Prove to me now that you know these people you got to know so well: list off every juror and where you think their vote stands at the moment. You can write undecided, or say they're deciding between two people or whatever, but I'll be comparing your list to the Jury chat so choose wisely.
LJ - Throughout this game, you stayed so quiet, even now, as the victory is within sight, your intro was super short, and you continue to joke. So, tell me what winning this game means to you, why do you want to win? 500 word minimum.
Tai - You have maybe the biggest victim complex of anyone I've ever met. List of everytime you were wronged and compare it to a list of every time you wronged someone in this game.
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that completely.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
Given how completely terrible you guys have been at answering questions tonight, I've done some revising:
Aubry - You definitely weren't the most aware of what was going on. Prove to me now that you know these people you got to know so well: list off every juror and where you think their vote stands at the moment. You can write undecided, or say they're deciding between two people or whatever, but I'll be comparing your list to the Jury chat so choose wisely.
LJ - Throughout this game, you stayed so quiet, even now, as the victory is within sight, your intro was super short, and you continue to joke. So, tell me what winning this game means to you, why do you want to win? 500 word minimum.
Tai - You have maybe the biggest victim complex of anyone I've ever met. List of everytime you were wronged and compare it to a list of every time you wronged someone in this game.
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
- Sun May 21, 2017 9:11:27 pm
#6578
Okay y'all, first of all, congrats to you all for making it this far! I enjoyed getting to know you all and I can genuinely say I like you all in some way or another. But, this is a game, so I'll be making my decision solely on gameplay.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that completely.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
Given how completely terrible you guys have been at answering questions tonight, I've done some revising:
Aubry - You definitely weren't the most aware of what was going on. Prove to me now that you know these people you got to know so well: who's votes do you think you have 100% tonight and why?
LJ - Throughout this game, you stayed so quiet, even now, as the victory is within sight, your intro was super short, and you continue to joke. So, tell me what winning this game means to you, why do you want to win?
Tai - You have maybe the biggest victim complex of anyone I've ever met. Who do you felt you've wronged the most and why?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
I think I speak for the majority of the jury tonight when I say that my vote's still up in the air. This is my current perspective on the situation:
I feel that Aubry, you had a strong social game, but were lacking when it came to reading the flow of the game and being able to make the right strategic decisions. You seemed lost at times and heavily under the jurisdiction of those in bigger alliances to include you in their plans. Now, hearing about your spreadsheet makes me even believe even more that you were clueless to some things given who you thought you could and couldn't beat. But hey, I'm cocky too so I can't fault you for that completely.
LJ, I got a strong sense that you were smarter than you were letting on when I first met you. You made some solid strategic decisions, but many people on the jury, myself included have find it hard to separate you from Lindsey, as she was the more outspoken one. She says that you did a lot of strategy, but I have yet to see how it connects to you. You're a funny dude, but shut up; stop joking around and prove to me that you want and deserve to win.
Tai, from my point of view the majority of your plans failed, but at least you played out in the open, and I can respect that. I don't see how you view yourself as being "bullied" though, but ok, I think some of my fellow jurors have more to say on that front.
Now, I could ask you all to define the moves that you made on your own that shaped your game, but that's boring, and I'm sure you've already been asked that. So instead, I want you two to own your game. In a season full of dull tribal councils, lukewarm responses, constant not trying to ruffle any feathers by giving vague answers, and passive participation at said tribals from both of you, now is your chance to own your game as your own. No more middle-of-the-road; it's time to choose a side, and if it's not yours, you're not getting my vote tonight.
Given how completely terrible you guys have been at answering questions tonight, I've done some revising:
Aubry - You definitely weren't the most aware of what was going on. Prove to me now that you know these people you got to know so well: who's votes do you think you have 100% tonight and why?
LJ - Throughout this game, you stayed so quiet, even now, as the victory is within sight, your intro was super short, and you continue to joke. So, tell me what winning this game means to you, why do you want to win?
Tai - You have maybe the biggest victim complex of anyone I've ever met. Who do you felt you've wronged the most and why?
Get brutal, get real: the entirety of the last 31 days is at stake.
Treemail