[Jeff Probst]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:16:25 pm #4682 Nobody, yall are just gonna let this happen with 4 minutes left... Guess that's that then.

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:16:41 pm #4683

So as per LJ's labels there, the only way that and of those 3 at the bottom win, is if they're sitting beside the other two?

Correct.

HOW

[Lindsey]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:17:02 pm #4684

Natalie, we've talked for a long time about goat status. You stated that you were playing the game hard and a few people came to your defense. Do you think that you have proven that you are a threat to win, or as you have mentioned in the past, are you happy letting people think you will 100% lose and getting taken to the end?

Jeff I have a game plan, a game plan that has not changed since the merge. I'm sticking to that plan. I don't think I am a goat. I think I have a strong enough case to beat every single person left in this game

[Steve]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:17:15 pm #4685

LJ... We've talked a lot in the past about threats vs. goats. It's no secret the lesser threats will not want the more threatening players in the end with them.

My question is, with only 3 spots in the final 3... there are 3 "threats" remaining in the game and 3 "non-threats." Are you confident you are on the right side of that equation?

I haven't been confident in this game since that first tribe swap, man.

I think the "threats" at this point are Andrea, Aubry, and Steve and Me, Tai, and Natalie are the "non-threats."

But like I've said before, those labels only matter if you actually make it to the end.

So, I'll ask Steve... if You, Aubry and Andrea are perceived as the threats to win, why hand the game to the other three?

Well that's the thing. I guess if there suddenly was a "threats" alliance and a "non-treats" alliance", either Tai or Natalie going home tonight would effectively end LJ and the other's game, in theory.

I really don't think it's that simple though, because those alliances aren't going to happen

[Jeff Probst]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:17:24 pm #4686 I mean, if you can't read the writing on the wall... I feel bad for you. It has been spelled out clearly in Council.

[Tai]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:17:32 pm #4687 There's plenty of combos 3-2, 4-1, who knows? I honestly can't give you any certain number on how the vote is turning out tonight. I think almost everyone has lied in this game..

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:17:50 pm #4689 I miss lindsey as a human but regret not getting her out 2nd after the merge just for this emoji game

[Jeff Probst]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:18:04 pm #4690 2 minutes.

[Lindsey]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:18:36 pm #4691

Correct.

HOW

[Jeff Probst]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:18:42 pm #4692

I haven't been confident in this game since that first tribe swap, man.

I think the "threats" at this point are Andrea, Aubry, and Steve and Me, Tai, and Natalie are the "non-threats."

But like I've said before, those labels only matter if you actually make it to the end.

So, I'll ask Steve... if You, Aubry and Andrea are perceived as the threats to win, why hand the game to the other three?

Well that's the thing. I guess if there suddenly was a "threats" alliance and a "non-treats" alliance", either Tai or Natalie going home tonight would effectively end LJ and the other's game, in theory.

I really don't think it's that simple though, because those alliances aren't going to happen

Are you telling me that or yourself?

[Lindsey]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:19:40 pm #4695

I miss lindsey as a human but regret not getting her out 2nd after the merge just for this emoji game

[Jeff Probst]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:20:00 pm #4696 Alright then.

At this time, all votes are final. If anyone has a Hidden Immunity Idol and would like to play it, you now have 5 minutes to do so.

I'll go tally the votes

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:20:06 pm #4697

I miss lindsey as a human but regret not getting her out 2nd after the merge just for this emoji game

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:21:45 pm #4698 so i'm telling my friend about this and he's like, "how do people have immunity this late in the game besides idols?"

and i'm like "well there's a challenge before every tribal for individual immunity"

and he's like

"i guess."


this just in, guy who has never seen survivor has opinions

[Julia]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:22:11 pm #4699

[Steve]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:22:24 pm #4700

So, I'll ask Steve... if You, Aubry and Andrea are perceived as the threats to win, why hand the game to the other three?

Well that's the thing. I guess if there suddenly was a "threats" alliance and a "non-treats" alliance", either Tai or Natalie going home tonight would effectively end LJ and the other's game, in theory.

I really don't think it's that simple though, because those alliances aren't going to happen

Are you telling me that or yourself?

I think out loud, thank you very much...

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:22:33 pm #4701

[Lindsey]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:22:37 pm #4702

so i'm telling my friend about this and he's like, "how do people have immunity this late in the game besides idols?"

and i'm like "well there's a challenge before every tribal for individual immunity"

and he's like

"i guess."


this just in, guy who has never seen survivor has opinions

[Andrea]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:22:57 pm #4703

Well that's the thing. I guess if there suddenly was a "threats" alliance and a "non-treats" alliance", either Tai or Natalie going home tonight would effectively end LJ and the other's game, in theory.

I really don't think it's that simple though, because those alliances aren't going to happen

Are you telling me that or yourself?

I think out loud, thank you very much...

and if you keep in mind that you're all actually me at different computers...

[Nick]

- Mon May 15, 2017 9:23:04 pm #4704

so i'm telling my friend about this and he's like, "how do people have immunity this late in the game besides idols?"

and i'm like "well there's a challenge before every tribal for individual immunity"

and he's like

"i guess."


this just in, guy who has never seen survivor has opinions