[Nick]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:43:27 pm #4067

If you guys really think that you can get Andrea out any time you want, by all means, vote me out. But let me tell ya, you'll keep saying "oh, she can go any time" and then by that points she's done you over.

So it comes down to if we're all competent enough to take Andrea out in the latter stages?

can you and your 3 immunities take me, Steve? :P

Andrea we all know you're a smart girl, you can win a challenge. Anyone can in all honesty. I say good luck to anyone who leaves her in tonight

[Lindsey]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:43:41 pm #4068

and for the record, I won one immunity challenge by the skin of my teeth. If you're so concerned about challenges, why isn't Steve a factor in this? Just trying to find a reason to keep Andrea over me when there isn't one.

Well, we can't exactly target him right now...

[Jeff Varner]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:43:53 pm #4069 I'm sure I don't need to remind you but the person going home doesn't have to use an idol on themselves in order to be safe.

Someone could see this as a prime opportunity to save what may amount to be a consensus boot and take out a big threat.

Are you comfortable being so vulnerable?

Last edited by Jeff Varner on Thu May 11, 2017 9:44:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

[Nick]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:44:19 pm #4070

and for the record, I won one immunity challenge by the skin of my teeth. If you're so concerned about challenges, why isn't Steve a factor in this? Just trying to find a reason to keep Andrea over me when there isn't one.

Well, we can't exactly target him right now...

I know, but he's never been brought up in any tribal councils? Again, if you're so concerned with challenges, why hasn't his name ever come up?

[Natalie]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:44:41 pm #4072

Natalie, by going after eachother, have Nick and Andrea made this relatively safe for the rest of you?

They are the two biggest threats in this game imo. I think they would've been the targets regardless of the situation. But yes, it seems like these two are the options to go home tonight.

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:44:49 pm #4073 LJ, Steve low key brought up you and Lindsey... did that slip past you?

[Andrea]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:45:13 pm #4074

So it comes down to if we're all competent enough to take Andrea out in the latter stages?

can you and your 3 immunities take me, Steve? :P

Andrea we all know you're a smart girl, you can win a challenge. Anyone can in all honesty. I say good luck to anyone who leaves her in tonight

I mean apparently I CAN'T, though. I haven't been close. I was last in the questions one yesterday. I was second out today. I found 3 words in the word search and I got 3 pit stops on the maze. I counted to 13 before I got distracted in the count-off.

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:45:32 pm #4075

Natalie, by going after eachother, have Nick and Andrea made this relatively safe for the rest of you?

They are the two biggest threats in this game imo. I think they would've been the targets regardless of the situation. But yes, it seems like these two are the options to go home tonight.

Which brings me back to my other question... if the two biggest threats are guaranteed to go home one after the ohter, why would they be complicit in that... Nick? Anyone?

[LJ]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:46:05 pm #4076

LJ, Steve low key brought up you and Lindsey... did that slip past you?

No but I was planning on ignoring it in case it slipped by everyone else. It's no secret that people link Lindsey and I together. We've been together since day one, it's only natural.

[Lindsey]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:46:06 pm #4077 I think arguing who can and can't win challenges is silly. Some of them are based on sheer luck. That's not what the focus should be.

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:46:29 pm #4078

I think arguing who can and can't win challenges is silly. Some of them are based on sheer luck. That's not what the focus should be.

What should the focus be?

[Lindsey]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:46:47 pm #4079

Natalie, by going after eachother, have Nick and Andrea made this relatively safe for the rest of you?

They are the two biggest threats in this game imo. I think they would've been the targets regardless of the situation. But yes, it seems like these two are the options to go home tonight.

Which brings me back to my other question... if the two biggest threats are guaranteed to go home one after the ohter, why would they be complicit in that... Nick? Anyone?

Who says they'll go back to back?

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:46:50 pm #4080 10 minutes.

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:47:25 pm #4081

They are the two biggest threats in this game imo. I think they would've been the targets regardless of the situation. But yes, it seems like these two are the options to go home tonight.

Which brings me back to my other question... if the two biggest threats are guaranteed to go home one after the ohter, why would they be complicit in that... Nick? Anyone?

Who says they'll go back to back?

Anything could happen, but Natalie just said that the two biggest threats are targets regardless of the situation...

[Lindsey]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:47:57 pm #4082

I think arguing who can and can't win challenges is silly. Some of them are based on sheer luck. That's not what the focus should be.

What should the focus be?

I think Nick should be trying to sell us on Andrea better than she has a chance of winning a challenge and making it to the end. He's not really giving me a solid reason to keep him over her.

[Morgan]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:48:00 pm #4083

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:48:25 pm #4084 Nick, Lindsey wants you to fight Andrea to the death... are you gonna jump?

[Steve]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:48:31 pm #4085 Andrea's not going to win 3 in a row. Neither is Nick. Neither am I. Neither is anyone. If there's someone that we're all desperate to go in the final 6 when that point comes, it'll happen, I think

[Nick]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:48:35 pm #4086

They are the two biggest threats in this game imo. I think they would've been the targets regardless of the situation. But yes, it seems like these two are the options to go home tonight.

Which brings me back to my other question... if the two biggest threats are guaranteed to go home one after the ohter, why would they be complicit in that... Nick? Anyone?

Who says they'll go back to back?

This Jeff^. Right now it's about making it to the next day so you can state your case more than the other. Not like we can flip and target someone else right now, eh?

[Jeff Probst]

- Thu May 11, 2017 9:49:30 pm #4087 Just interesting that we had all this talk of goats and threats... last council a goat went home because they were "untrustworthy" this time, 2 of the biggest threats are asked to fight eachother by the tribe.