By Andrea
#3407
Nick wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:41:18 pm
LJ wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:39:46 pm
Andrea wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:39:02 pm
who has kids?? if i don't get baby pictures after this game is over i stg....
Me. And I could really use the million dollars please.
I knew LJ was the other mom in the game, I called it
it's true
User avatar
 

Andrea

  • Juror
  • Posts: 1315
By Morgan
#3408 I don't think I'm a risk to be aligned with. If anything, me not being at challenges is a GOOD thing for you. You'll have a better shot at immunity, and I've always been a consistent person at voting and discussions.
User avatar
 

Morgan

  • Juror
  • Posts: 196
By LJ
#3410
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:42:24 pm
LJ has the immunity given you an opportunity to approach people who you normally wouldn't? Are people planning next round out with you knowing you will be there?
I think a lot of people in the majority are thinking about making a move, but feel like this might not be the right time so yeah, I think knowing that I will be someone they have to deal with next round if that is their moment has made me a little more popular socially. I'll take what I can get.
User avatar
 

LJ

  • Al-Mahrah Tribe
  • Posts: 308
By Andrea
#3411
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:43:14 pm
Andrea, do you think that "goats" are necessarily reliable in terms of a number?
From watching the show, sure, I think goats are useful in that way. But I don't see any goats left in this game at this point.
User avatar
 

Andrea

  • Juror
  • Posts: 1315
By Aubry
#3413
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:39:47 pm
I'll stop giving Morgan and Natalie all of the screentime.

Let's go to someone else. Aubry, is this game becoming predictable or is every moment live and up for grabs?
I think recently things have been pretty predictable vote-wise, but as these answers can tell you, this game is anything but boring icon_razz
User avatar
 

Aubry

  • Al-Mahrah Tribe
  • Posts: 623
By Morgan
#3414 Before the votes are due, I have something to say.

If people perceive me and Natalie as goats, then why vote us out?

If I don't show up to a challenge because I can't, Isn't that giving you a better shot at winning immunity?

Everything that's being complained about as a negative for myself or Natalie is a positive for the remaining players in this game. It doesn't make sense to take either of us out.
User avatar
 

Morgan

  • Juror
  • Posts: 196
By Steve
#3417
Morgan wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:42:39 pm
I don't think I'm a risk to be aligned with. If anything, me not being at challenges is a GOOD thing for you. You'll have a better shot at immunity, and I've always been a consistent person at voting and discussions.
So it's all tribal! I don't wanna go home at any point because one of my votes isn't around, and I trust you, and everyone WILL be around when push comes to shove. That goes for everyone though, not just yourself ^^
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Spencer
#3420
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:40:45 pm
I'll ask Spencer and Nick the same question. Both Sheikhs, both played on separate tribes but were talking throughout the game... Have you guys put any faith into the word of the other person in regards to friendships. As in... Nick do you trust what Spencer told you about his tribemates and Spencer, vice versa.
When I saw Nick sauntering up the beach to meet me that first night I knew I we had something... special <3
In all seriousness, I took what Nick told me about Aomak and then I compared it to see if it matched my own perceptions, and in most cases it did so I think that built a lot of trust between us. That being said, it's not as if he's the only person here who's perception I trust, especially now that we're all together and I've had a chance to meet everyone.
User avatar
 

Spencer

  • Juror
  • Posts: 564
By Jeff Probst
#3421 I'd like to share a very special story:

The story of Stranded in India.

You see they too had 2 goats that were semi-active and 100% boring. The interesting players all took eachohter out one by one for being "threats" until 1 semi-threat and 2 goats were left in the final 3 with a jury full of the most entertaining and brilliant players in stranded history.

So the jury all got together and decided, let's give them one last blindside. The entire tribal Council they built up the semi-threat to think he was going to win. They didn't even ask the other two any questions. In fact they told them to be silent becuase they wouldn't get their vote. Just to post a single period "." to show that they were there.

When the votes came in, the first one was for the threat... and the other 6... for the least active player in the game.

It was the final blindside. The jury had won. The inactive was the winner and they refused to reward someone for dragging two semi-active votes to the final.

Just something to think about.
User avatar
 

Jeff Probst

  • Detwah Tribe
  • Posts: 1089
By Morgan
#3422
Spencer wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:49:32 pm
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:40:45 pm
I'll ask Spencer and Nick the same question. Both Sheikhs, both played on separate tribes but were talking throughout the game... Have you guys put any faith into the word of the other person in regards to friendships. As in... Nick do you trust what Spencer told you about his tribemates and Spencer, vice versa.
When I saw Nick sauntering up the beach to meet me that first night I knew I we had something... special <3
In all seriousness, I took what Nick told me about Aomak and then I compared it to see if it matched my own perceptions, and in most cases it did so I think that built a lot of trust between us. That being said, it's not as if he's the only person here who's perception I trust, especially now that we're all together and I've had a chance to meet everyone.
Aww, so what am I spenceyspice, chopped liver? ;c
User avatar
 

Morgan

  • Juror
  • Posts: 196
By Lindsey
#3423
Morgan wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:41:04 pm
Lindsey wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:39:39 pm
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:38:03 pm


Maybe so, but then why play? There are people with jobs, school and CHILDREN who show up to this game. That was understood when they filled out the application adn went through their interviews...

So you said you cant show up to challenges, only councils... Yet here you are at a Council, when a challenge would normally be going on and a Challenge is going to follow this. Will you conveniently be gone during that too or is it just a coincidence?
And she has the audacity to call me a bitch and say I missed last night's challenge! Yeah, I missed one challenge. I've also been here for every single other event. It's about prioritizing and planning out. Sorry.
I called you a bitch because you were acting bitchy, I call it like I see it. I don't dislike you as a person but I dislike how you're acting right now.
.....because I'm the one that came in swinging full blast to the merge chat and all.....
User avatar
 

Lindsey

  • Juror
  • Posts: 675
By Jeff Probst
#3424 At this time all votes are final.

If anyone has a Hidden Immunity Idol and would like to use it on themselves or someone else, you now have 5 minutes to do so.

I'll go tally teh votes.
User avatar
 

Jeff Probst

  • Detwah Tribe
  • Posts: 1089
By Andrea
#3425
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:49:43 pm
I'd like to share a very special story:

The story of Stranded in India.

You see they too had 2 goats that were semi-active and 100% boring. The interesting players all took eachohter out one by one for being "threats" until 1 semi-threat and 2 goats were left in the final 3 with a jury full of the most entertaining and brilliant players in stranded history.

So the jury all got together and decided, let's give them one last blindside. The entire tribal Council they built up the semi-threat to think he was going to win. They didn't even ask the other two any questions. In fact they told them to be silent becuase they wouldn't get their vote. Just to post a single period "." to show that they were there.

When the votes came in, the first one was for the threat... and the other 6... for the least active player in the game.

It was the final blindside. The jury had won. The inactive was the winner and they refused to reward someone for dragging two semi-active votes to the final.

Just something to think about.
Honestly Jeff this pisses me off.

I consider Natalie and Morgan to both be friends of mine who are doing a ton behind the scenes. They're not inactive. They're not goats.

I would not have survived New Hadiboh without Natalie. I would not have survived votes that I've survived since the merge without both Natalie and Morgan. I've talked strategy in both of them. I've confided in both of them.

These are real people and real players that you are talking about, and neither of them is undeserving of the win.
User avatar
 

Andrea

  • Juror
  • Posts: 1315
By Natalie
#3426
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:49:43 pm
I'd like to share a very special story:

The story of Stranded in India.

You see they too had 2 goats that were semi-active and 100% boring. The interesting players all took eachohter out one by one for being "threats" until 1 semi-threat and 2 goats were left in the final 3 with a jury full of the most entertaining and brilliant players in stranded history.

So the jury all got together and decided, let's give them one last blindside. The entire tribal Council they built up the semi-threat to think he was going to win. They didn't even ask the other two any questions. In fact they told them to be silent becuase they wouldn't get their vote. Just to post a single period "." to show that they were there.

When the votes came in, the first one was for the threat... and the other 6... for the least active player in the game.

It was the final blindside. The jury had won. The inactive was the winner and they refused to reward someone for dragging two semi-active votes to the final.

Just something to think about.
Probst high-key trying to influence the vote. I dont like it.
User avatar
 

Natalie

  • Juror
  • Posts: 123
By Natalie
#3427
Andrea wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:51:40 pm
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:49:43 pm
I'd like to share a very special story:

The story of Stranded in India.

You see they too had 2 goats that were semi-active and 100% boring. The interesting players all took eachohter out one by one for being "threats" until 1 semi-threat and 2 goats were left in the final 3 with a jury full of the most entertaining and brilliant players in stranded history.

So the jury all got together and decided, let's give them one last blindside. The entire tribal Council they built up the semi-threat to think he was going to win. They didn't even ask the other two any questions. In fact they told them to be silent becuase they wouldn't get their vote. Just to post a single period "." to show that they were there.

When the votes came in, the first one was for the threat... and the other 6... for the least active player in the game.

It was the final blindside. The jury had won. The inactive was the winner and they refused to reward someone for dragging two semi-active votes to the final.

Just something to think about.
Honestly Jeff this pisses me off.

I consider Natalie and Morgan to both be friends of mine who are doing a ton behind the scenes. They're not inactive. They're not goats.

I would not have survived New Hadiboh without Natalie. I would not have survived votes that I've survived since the merge without both Natalie and Morgan. I've talked strategy in both of them. I've confided in both of them.

These are real people and real players that you are talking about, and neither of them is undeserving of the win.
*fist bumps*
User avatar
 

Natalie

  • Juror
  • Posts: 123
By Morgan
#3428 Lindsey, I did come in super intense. I'm an intense person who does live a stressful life, and I am sorry for coming in so strong. I got offended by you saying I wasn't trying because I am and I did get a bit butthurt over it.

Can't change what I said, but I can give a genuine apology. Whether I leave tonight or not, I don't want any of us to be on bad terms.
User avatar
 

Morgan

  • Juror
  • Posts: 196
By Andrea
#3429 There is nothing boring about either Natalie or Morgan, and honestly I'm sorry to both of you that Jeff said that. That would really have hurt my feelings if I were in your shoes.
User avatar
 

Andrea

  • Juror
  • Posts: 1315
By Spencer
#3430
Morgan wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:50:19 pm
Spencer wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:49:32 pm
Jeff Probst wrote:
Wed May 10, 2017 8:40:45 pm
I'll ask Spencer and Nick the same question. Both Sheikhs, both played on separate tribes but were talking throughout the game... Have you guys put any faith into the word of the other person in regards to friendships. As in... Nick do you trust what Spencer told you about his tribemates and Spencer, vice versa.
When I saw Nick sauntering up the beach to meet me that first night I knew I we had something... special <3
In all seriousness, I took what Nick told me about Aomak and then I compared it to see if it matched my own perceptions, and in most cases it did so I think that built a lot of trust between us. That being said, it's not as if he's the only person here who's perception I trust, especially now that we're all together and I've had a chance to meet everyone.
Aww, so what am I spenceyspice, chopped liver? ;c
More like fillet mignon <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
User avatar
 

Spencer

  • Juror
  • Posts: 564

Treemail