5th Place | 8th Juror | Voted Out 3 - 2
By Steve
#6357 Gimme a bit, I'm still working :P
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6361 I'M TRYING BUT NOW I'M THINKING ABOUT APPLES AND THERE'S A PIECE OF APPLE STRUDEL IN THE FRIDGE AND I'M REALLY CRAVING IT AND IT MIGHT MAKE ME WORK BETTER SO I'M JUST GONNA GO NOW I'LL BE BACK PROMISE BYE
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6375 Ayyy we finally made it! I dunno about you three, Aubs, LJ and Tai, but I have a feeling that my nervousness about tonight might might be more than yours. I dunno why, either. Steve, you're irrelevant. Stop rambling.

Great icon_ha Anyways!

So I think it’s fair to say that none of the three of you played the sexiest of games. A bit of lurking, a bit of just flat out surviving. In fact, in that Public Tribal that Nick went out, where it was really crunch time for some people, I think the most notable post between the three of you was a triumphant:
By LJ - Thu May 11, 2017 10:29:25 pm
what we do
By Mr. LJ over there.

But hey, that’s strategic and it obviously worked for each of you. I'm probably gonna have less of a problem with that than a lot of my fellow jury members, so bravo for that. :)

I think my main concern for each of you was as follows, and don't feel like you need to address them, really, my question's coming:

1)LJ- It's obvious that anyone needs to be lucky to make it where you have. But I still struggle to get past your sticking around not being dumb luck. You seemed to be always the #2 choice of that original majority alliance to vote out. So I dunno if you somehow got that to happen, yourself, or it was just dumb luck that your name was never the final decision.

2)Aubs- Simply enough, I don't know if you were AWARE enough about the game around you. You're super strategic, I can't deny that. But those votes of yours were in the minority or just ill-justified a few too many times, if you ask me.

3)Tai- You were forced to come into the merge guns a' blazin' because of those early controversies. And that's fine. But directly after, and you told me this yourself, you needed to shut up. I DO think that was smart, but I'm concerned that you spent too much of this game in silence to give yourself a legitimate enough shot.

Actually for you Tai (I think I told most of you I'm like, super into sports) I'd compare you (For LJ <3) to the Buffalo Bills. You start out with a bang every year, then fizzle out. The only difference is that you, Tai, don't have a former head coach whose desk donned a picture of a foot fetish model.

(and yes, I was planning to compare you all to pro sports franchises, but LJ was gonna be the Detroit Red Wings and that's just an unfair disadvantage)

___________________________________________________________

Anyways! Phew I'm sweating by now! Now that we've gone through a mind-map of every thought Steve has ever had, my question. It's related to my concern about Aubry, in that each of you concerned me to an extent in how aware of the game and its players you all were. To me, knowing what's going on with others is one key characteristic of most deserving winners. That being said:

I'd like each of you to just say what the best part/ biggest strength, and also the worst part/ biggest weakness of each of the other 2 finalists' journey.

Thanks for sticking with that, best of luck to each of you! icon_laughing icon_ha icon_razz
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6376 Now I cut it down to half that size! The creative process! Wooooooo! (first person voted out... so sad :( )
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6390 ***
Ayyy we finally made it! I dunno about you three, but I have a feeling that my nervousness about tonight might might be more than yours. I dunno why, either. Steve, you're irrelevant. Stop rambling.

icon_ha Anyways!

So I think it’s fair to say that none of the three of you played the sexiest of games. A bit of lurking, a bit of just flat out surviving. In fact, in that Public Tribal where Nick went out, where it was really crunch time for some people, I think the most notable post between the three of you was a triumphant:
By LJ - Thu May 11, 2017 10:29:25 pm
what we do
By Mr. LJ over there.

But hey, that’s strategic and it obviously worked for each of you. I'm probably gonna have less of a problem with that than a lot of my fellow jury members, so bravo for that. icon_smile I think my main concern for each of you was as follows, and don't feel like you need to address them, really, my question's coming:

1)LJ- It's obvious that anyone needs to be lucky to make it where you have. But I still struggle to get past your sticking around not being dumb luck. You seemed to be always the #2 choice of that original majority alliance to vote out. So I dunno if you somehow got that to happen, yourself, or it was just dumb luck that your name was never the final decision.

2)Aubs- Simply enough, I don't know if you were AWARE enough about the game around you. You're super strategic, I can't deny that. But those votes of yours were in the minority or just ill-justified a few too many times, if you ask me.

3)Tai- You were forced to come into the merge guns a' blazin' because of those early controversies. And that's fine. But directly after, and you told me this yourself, you needed to shut up. I DO think that was smart, but I'm concerned that you spent too much of this game in silence to give yourself a legitimate enough shot.

Actually for you Tai (I think I told most of you I'm like, super into sports) I'd compare you (For LJ <3) to the Buffalo Bills. You start out with a bang every year, then fizzle out. The only difference is that you, Tai, don't have a former head coach whose desk donned a picture of a foot fetish model.

(and yes, I was planning to compare you all to pro sports franchises, but LJ was gonna be the Detroit Red Wings and that's just an unfair disadvantage)

___________________________________________________________

Anyways! Phew I'm sweating by now! Now that we've gone through a mind-map of every thought Steve has ever had, my question. It's related to my concern about Aubry, in I was troubled, to an extent, in each of your levels of awareness in the game. To me, knowing what's going on with others, and the flow of the game as a whole is one key characteristic of most deserving winners. That being said:

I'd like each of you to just state the best and worst part of each of the other 2 finalists' games, or their journey as a whole

Thanks for sticking with that, best of luck to each of you! icon_laughing icon_ha icon_razz
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6391 use second draft, obviously!
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667
By Steve
#6497 ***
Ayyy we finally made it! I dunno about you three, but I have a feeling that my nervousness about tonight might might be more than yours. I dunno why, either. Steve, you're irrelevant. Stop rambling.

icon_ha Anyways!

So I think it’s fair to say that none of the three of you played the sexiest of games. A bit of lurking, a bit of just flat out surviving. In fact, in that Public Tribal where Nick went out, where it was really crunch time for some people, I think the most notable post between the three of you was a triumphant:
By LJ - Thu May 11, 2017 10:29:25 pm
what we do
By Mr. LJ over there.

But hey, that’s strategic and it obviously worked for each of you. I'm probably gonna have less of a problem with that than a lot of my fellow jury members, so bravo for that. icon_smile I think my main concern for each of you was as follows, and don't feel like you need to address them, really, my question's coming:

1)LJ- It's obvious that anyone needs to be lucky to make it where you have. But I still struggle to get past your sticking around not being dumb luck. You seemed to be always the #2 choice of that original majority alliance to vote out. So I dunno if you somehow got that to happen, yourself, or it was just dumb luck that your name was never the final decision.

2)Aubs- Simply enough, I don't know if you were AWARE enough about the game around you. You're super strategic, I can't deny that. But those votes of yours were in the minority or just ill-justified a few too many times, if you ask me.

3)Tai- You were forced to come into the merge guns a' blazin' because of those early controversies. And that's fine. But directly after, and you told me this yourself, you needed to shut up. I DO think that was smart, but I'm concerned that you spent too much of this game in silence to give yourself a legitimate enough shot.

Actually for you Tai (I think I told most of you I'm like, super into sports) I'd compare you (For LJ <3) to the Buffalo Bills. You start out with a bang every year, then fizzle out. The only difference is that you, Tai, don't have a former head coach whose desk donned a picture of a foot fetish model.

(and yes, I was planning to compare you all to pro sports franchises, but LJ was gonna be the Detroit Red Wings and that's just an unfair disadvantage)

___________________________________________________________

Anyways! Phew I'm sweating by now! Now that we've gone through a mind-map of every thought Steve has ever had, my question. It's related to my concern about Aubry, in I was troubled, to an extent, in each of your levels of awareness in the game. To me, knowing what's going on with others, and the flow of the game as a whole is one key characteristic of most deserving winners. That being said:

I'd like each of you to just state the best and worst part of each of the other 2 finalists' games, or their journey as a whole

Thanks for sticking with that, best of luck to each of you! icon_laughing icon_ha icon_razz
User avatar
 

Steve

  • Juror
  • Posts: 667

Treemail